The Joys and Dangers of Expired Film

← back


Wait, There's an Expiration Date!?

    Most basically, film is a base (commonly polyester or acetate) with a light-sensitive emulsion coating on one side. There are many different size formats and emulsion types. Differences in emulsions is what you're seeing with all the various products like Kodak Ektachrome or Ilford HP5+ (as differences in the base material is inconsequential in most cases). I'll come back to those different emulsions in a bit, but first, let's talk about what it means for film to expire. Over time, the emulsion will decrease in light sensitivity, there will be loss of contrast, colors will shift (for color film), and grain will be more prominent. This doesn't happen all at once on the expiration date, and not all film types will be affected uniformly. Storing in a refrigerator can delay the rate of degradation, but the film will keep steadily getting worse over time, no matter what.
    Most film falls into one of these three categories: black and white negative, color negative, and color reversal (or slide) film. How quickly expiration affects these types is typically in that order: black and white will generally go the longest after expiration without seeing much loss in sensitivity, color negative film will see sensitivity loss more quickly and eventually colors will get all wonky, and slide film will get hit the worst with the most noticable effects, often losing those rich black levels and color saturation pretty quickly. Slide film has a narrow exposure latitude and is pretty unforgiving, even when fresh, so it can be really challenging to shoot after expiration. Personally, I wouldn't shoot anything critical on expired slide film.

So, What Can I Do About It?

    As mentioned earlier, storing in a fridge can slow the expiration process (remember to take it out and let the film acclimate for a while before shooting, in order to avoid moisture). Let's talk about how to shoot expired film to compensate for the degradation. Primarily, it's the lower light sensitivity that we'll address. Unfortunately, there's not a sure-fire formula, but a good starting point is to meter one stop below the stated box speed of the film, per decade expired (e.g. a roll of Kodacolor 200 that expired 20 years ago should be shot at ISO 50). However, you may not know the expiration date of a given roll. In that case, first do some research on the film stock to see when it was last produced, or if it's an older roll of something still being made, see if the logo has changed over the years and try to get a rough date that way. The best case scenario is if you have multiple rolls from the same batch, then you can shoot a test roll to help you determine how to shoot the rest. Either way, it'll be a good idea to bracket your exposures and take notes.
    If you're doing your own development (or using a lab that has the options to do so), you have a few other ways to deal with this. You can can push process the film. By how much will take some experimentation, and keep in mind that the results will differ from those if the film was shot at a lower ISO and then processed normally (it'll be even grainier, but you may recover some of the contrast). For black and white, or color film developed in black and white chemicals, you can do a stand development, which is perfect for when you're not sure of a film's ISO rating.

Expect the Unexpected

    No matter what measures you take, expired film will always present a level of unpredictability. You can never be quite certain how it's going to turn out, but really that's part of the fun. As long as you're comfortable with this aspect of randomness, I would really encourage you to play around with some expired film. You might get some unexpectedly delightful results!
    Let me show off a few recent shots taken on expired film:

Kodacolor VR 200, expired circa 1986, shot at ISO 50

wavy structure
This was shot on Kodak VR 200, which I metered at ISO 50. However, I should have done my research first. This film stock was discontinued in 1986! I should've metered way lower, but oh well.
pond
I think the expired film with its graininess, off-kilter colors, and underexposure really make this picture. The ripples in the pond, along with the creepy atmosphere, makes me think some sort of ominous creature is about to crawl out of the water!
kia
This time you can easily spot a light leak on the edge of the frame. This is very common in film that's been stored for a long time in less-than-ideal conditions. Cool and dark is best!

TMax 100, unknown expiration, shot at ISO 12

river face
Ok, there's a lot going on here. Firstly, I have no idea when this roll expired, but I knew the design on the cassette hadn't looked like that in decades. The film leader was out, so I assumed it hadn't been shot... I was obviously wrong! This was the first shot on the roll. As I was advancing the film after loading, I inadvertantly captured the river I was at, but on top of that was this weird face! It was not uncommon for photographers to swap between black-and-white and color, mid-roll. I think that's what happened here, but this face is the only discernable image retained by the original shots from all those years ago.
path
Here you can really see how much tonality and contrast was lost over the years, leaving a rather flat looking image.

Kodak Gold 200, expired 2010, shot at ISO 64

archway
This roll was in its original packaging, so I knew the date of expiration, making things a lot easier. The grain is definitely more prominent, and the colors are noticeably less saturated, but honestly not too bad.
grass in the sun
Again, pretty tame, compared to the older rolls. 15 years is probably about the edge for color negative to still yield fairly normal results.


← back